The soul that is ordered is governed by Reason, and therefore keeps one’s emotions and one’s appetites under control. The lower passions must submit to the dictates of Reason. According to Plato, the soul is placed inside the body at birth, after it has traveled from the realm of the forms. When it arrives in the body, it forgets the forms which enable a person to be moral and live a meaningful life. Flats idea sounds convincing. However, a soul can be many different things pending on where you live, religion or beliefs you adhere to.
For me it’s an interchangeable work of some sort of split. In fact, not because it sounds so attractive doesn’t mean It exists. That might be the very reason why It was Invented In the first place. I for one would love to have a soul. I would love to be assured that some part of me lives eternally after I die or get reincarnated into something else. I have never been shown any evidence or proof that such a thing exists. This is a power a faith that many people have compared to my faith in pink unicorns.
It is evident that things that were inexplicable is now been explained through increase knowledge or improvements in science. In addition, there are no specifications to whether embryos have souls. At what point does a person develop a soul? What about the thousands of frozen embryos which effectively cannot function. Where is their soul? If the soul develop based on genetic mutation that notion is simply ridiculous. While others believe that, souls have thoughts and can feel that they can believe and commit to purposeful actions.
However, none can quite agree on exactly where they come from or how they popped Into existence and so Flats notion Is simply ridiculous. In De’ Anima, Aristotle notion differs from the usual conception of a soul as some sort of substance occupying the body, existing separately and eternally. To him, the soul is the essence of a living thing. The soul is what makes an organism an organism by actualization its potential for life, and it’s constituted by its capacity for activities essential to that specific type of being.
He rejects the notion hat the body can unify a divided soul, but he also argues that if a higher soul is claimed to unify the soul, then this higher soul is the soul philosophers are looking for and they should begin with it. If that soul is not properly unified, then the search could well go on for Infinity. Secondly, Aristotle questions whether the tripartite structure can easily fit empirical evidence. For example, plants and insects, when bisected, continue living. Aristotle notes that the whole soul Is divided, but not Into Its three would-be constituent parts.
Each segment contains the whole soul, as It were with all three parts. Aristotle theory bears some difficulties. What format does the soul nave. Does It manner to rules Tanat Attlee It as a soul? By calming ten existence of a soul, Aristotle is opening up far more unknown and questions than the more simple plausible option that the soul does not existing. In the writer’s opinion the soul offers a get out of Jail free card to proponents of free will without explaining how the soul works or offers any viable evidence. People thinking that it is the root to free ill decisions of intentions.
In order for any of this to be acceptable explanation, I would first ask for a detailed explanation of the mechanisms in our earthly bodies that interact with the soul of how the soul realistically negotiates our intentions and will. The soul is often confused with the mind. The mind and body are separate entities but how the mind does tell the body to do something. For example, if the mind or the soul wants to tell me to pick up a pencil, the neurons in my brain are firing telling my hand to pick up the pencil which is a very physical thing.
But, how does something that is physical gets affected by a nonphysical impulse? This theory contradicts Aristotle claim. It is the aim of the soul according to philosophers to balance humans’ former unfair life with the riches of an afterlife. It allows them the possibility of giving purpose to their lives. Everyone talks about souls but no one knows what they are or where they are located. The body eyes cannot see it; therefore it can’t exist…. As far as eye can tell. If everyone shares spirit, what divine purpose could the soul possibly serve that a spirit does not? None.