Driving

Ashley Halley discusses why laws and new laws for “testing while driving are ineffective” and fails to meet an impact. Ashley Halley reminds us that “testing while driving” can lead up to fatal crashes and distractions in the U. S. (par. L). Laws and new laws failed to meet an agreement. Par. L). She states that “cell phone bans around the country might take years to become effective, (par. L) just like drunk driving laws before them” said Ashley Halley. (par. L). Ashley article about “Laws against Testing While Driving Are Ineffective” is very explainable. I agree with Ashley Hallways point about why laws and new laws failed to meet an impact with “testing while driving” being an issue. First of all, Ashley Halley argues that “laws against testing while driving are ineffective” (par. ) which I agree with 110%. Ashley explains that laws against it has little affect (par. L). Many people may argue on that the fact that testing and driving isn’t that bad, but testing and driving is the biggest issue of it all. Ashley Halley is saying that testing while driving is a dangerous distraction; also laws against It have small effect (par. L). I agree with Ashley Halley statement 110% because I believe that laws against testing and driving should have laws towards It.

So, therefore I agree with Ashley Hallways point about why laws and news laws have no effective and should be a big concern. Secondly, Ashley Halley believes testing bans should be reduced. I agree with this statement. “Laws are ineffective” said by; Adrian Lund. “Lund says that while state legislatures are increasing speed limits to 75 MPH [miles per hour], safety efforts has been “sidetracked by focus on reports on UN Lastly, Ashley Halley says that cell phones are distracting for the most part.

It’s been a long time since text messaging had been around showing estimates that It’s dangerous while driving. Testing and driving Is Ineffective why? Because I believe this wasn’t a big enough problem to handle and discuss too many others. The author explains why cell phones usage has been out while driving for years, and now trying to put an end towards the Issue (pig. 3) I agree tit Ashley argument because we don’t want lives to end all because of a text message. In addition I agree that somehow ‘Testing while Driving” eventually becomes a law.

In conclusion, Ashley Hallways mall points were to reenact the fact that “Testing while driving” Is Ineffective (Toddlers- Driving-campaign, U. S. ). My evaluation of the author mall point Is basically testing and driving, testing and driving has “estimated 450,000 people killed or Injured last year In distracted accidents” That should have not happened. With testing and driving being the risk of anger, people need to find a way to not have out their cell phones while driving. This Is only happening In the U. S and should come too major stop.

Driving By damselflies-22 distraction; also laws against it have small effect (par. L). I agree with Ashley Halley laws towards it. So, therefore I agree with Ashley Hallways point about why laws and around showing estimates that it’s dangerous while driving. Testing and driving is ineffective why? Because I believe this wasn’t a big enough problem to handle and while driving for years, and now trying to put an end towards the issue (pig. 3) I agree message. In addition I agree that somehow “Testing while Driving” eventually becomes a law.

In conclusion, Ashley Hallways main points were to reenact the fact that “Testing while driving” is ineffective (District- Driving-campaign, U. S. ). My evaluation of the author main point is basically testing and driving, testing and driving has “estimated 450,000 people killed or injured last year in distracted accidents” That should have not happened. With testing and driving being the risk of danger, people need to find a way to not have out their cell phones while driving. This is only happening in the U. S and should come to a major stop.